Dublin Airport worker who told Aer Lingus employee to 'f**k off' will get early High Court hearing to challenge his dismissal

Judge hears that the employee of ESP Global Services, which manages Dublin Airport on behalf of Daa, would not be reinstated pending the court proceedings
Dublin Airport worker who told Aer Lingus employee to 'f**k off' will get early High Court hearing to challenge his dismissal

The IT systems engineer told the court he had apologised a number of times for telling the Aer Lingus staff member to 'go away' and ultimately to 'fuck off'. File picture: Steve Parsons/PA

A worker with a contract company at Dublin Airport who was sacked after he told an Aer Lingus customer services check-in representative to “fuck off” will get an early hearing of his High Court action challenging his dismissal, a judge said on Tuesday.

After being told that Colm Dunne had not been reinstated pending his challenge, Mr Justice Brian Cregan said he was prepared to give a hearing date for his case before the courts’ Easter break at the end of next week.

Mr Dunne, an IT systems engineer, claims his dismissal by his employer, airport support services firm ESP Global Services Ltd, over the “fuck off” remark was extremely harsh and not proportionate. He had an unblemished record with the firm since starting work with it in 2021, he says.

He claims the ESP disciplinary process was defective and unfair and that it acted unlawfully in its decision.

'Unfortunate interaction' at Dublin Airport

The case arose over what Mr Dunne said was an unfortunate interaction between him and a male member of the Aer Lingus customer service team at the self-service flight check-in kiosks in the early hours of January 27 towards the end of his night shift.

Mr Dunne, St Laurence’s Park, Drogheda, Co Louth, said the Aer Lingus employee had approached him while he was working to fix one kiosk about another faulty kiosk. He was concentrating on fixing the printer in the machine and did not respond, he said.

When asked by the other man if Mr Dunne could hear him, he admitted that he “regrettably” told him to “go away” and ultimately to “fuck off”.

The Aer Lingus worker, in his complaint later that day to Collins Aerospace, which manages the airport on behalf of the Daa, claimed that after telling him to fuck off, Mr Dunne “approached me again and said I deserved it”.

Suspension and dismissal

ESP suspended him on pay and over a week later carried out an alleged gross misconduct hearing. It was held via Microsoft Teams on February 7, 2025, attended by Mr Dunne, ESP global aviation services manager, Gregor Young, and Louise Morgon, People Partner Lead.

Mr Dunne said he apologised a number of times at the hearing for the use of the word but later that same morning Mr Young informed Mr Dunne he was dismissed with immediate effect for gross misconduct.

Appeal hearing 

Mr Dunne lodged an appeal which was heard by two other senior ESP staff — Mike George, VP People and Ian Essai, VP global operations. 

He said the appeal failed to address or remedy the very serious defects of fairness of procedure and due process or to address his implied contractual right of an adequate response to an act of misconduct. He says the appeal panel predetermined its decision.

High Court injunction 

Mr Dunne sought a High Court injunction and last week Mr Justice Brian Cregan restrained ESP from taking any steps to give effect to the purported dismissal.

When the case returned before the judge on Tuesday, Conor Power SC, for Mr Dunne, said it had been agreed with the ESP side to adjourn the matter for a week to allow the defendant to file a replying affidavit with the injunction to continue until then.

Asked by the judge if Mr Dunne would be reinstated pending the proceedings, Mr Power said no and this was why a short adjournment for a week had been sought. They were seeking to expedite matters, he said.

Asked by the judge if the affidavit could be filed before the end of the week, Hayley O’Donnell BL, for ESP, said her side was prepared to do so. 

She said the body of the affidavit ran to 20 pages and while they had initially sought a two-week adjournment they had agreed to one week.

The judge said he would adjourn for a week to allow for the replying affidavit to be filed.

He said he would be very keen to have the matter heard within a few days and before the courts break for Easter.

More in this section

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

Š Examiner Echo Group Limited